Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppleClips Daily


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE &mdash;Wh o uk (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

AppleClips Daily
Non-notable podcast that just started this month. Is hosted at Podomatic as it can't even afford its own website. --Hetar 18:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Delete - 85 Ghits, without inverted commas. --Nydas 18:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Correction Hetar, podomatic is a pay service, and this podcast recieves over 900 hits a day (feed views). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.197.140 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Correction Hetar, podomatic is a pay service, and this podcast recieves over 900 hits a day (feed views). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.197.140 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom. Caveat lector 19:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 19:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral- Notability is not policy. Just beacuse the podcaster can't pay for a website doesn't make it worthy for deletion. The only reason im neutral is due to the cast possibly being vanity, which is policy. -- Chris   Ccool2ax   contrib.  19:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If there's no other assertion of notability, I don't care whether the podcast has its own site or not. It gets a very low number of Google hits, there are no external references, and the podcast itself was started three weeks ago. If they did have their own site, but all other criteria was the same, I don't think anybody (including myself) would be changing their vote from delete to keep. -- Kicking222 21:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Few google hits, no sources claiming notability. Wickethewok 19:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.