Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple M2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) AmirŞah  11:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Apple M2

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article has only one source and, relies entirely on a single source for a long time. I think it needs to delete or redirect to Apple silicon. And, someone redirected to Apple silicon and someone removed redirect regularly. Hajoon0102 💬 15:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Hajoon0102 💬 15:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is based on an Apple press release; I can't find sources talking about the chip itself, only that it's been used in various computer thingies. Oaktree b (talk) 16:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Whether an article has poor references is not a reason to delete an article. The question is whether third party reliable coverage independent of the subject exists, and it does, e.g. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/apple-m2-chip and a zillion other articles. Samboy (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of reliable sources available, definitely more than press releases. Google is your friend. —Locke Cole • t • c 18:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Very easily found multiple reliable sources with a simple Google search.        . Realistically pretty much every major product announcement from the world's most valuable corporation is going to get plenty of coverage and is going to be notable. Thparkth (talk) 13:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy SNOW keep If ever there was a WP:SNOW keep, this is it. This is a major chip made by a world-class hardware and software company.  It has a ton of coverage both in the technical press and the mainstream press.  This AFD should be withdrawn or closed rapidly by an admin.  Samboy (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, it is blindly obvious there are many sources here such as . -- Mvqr (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.