Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appli Archives


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Appli Archives

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem notable. No good sources. TheLongTone (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as I seeing nothing obviously better. Pinging tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  05:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging interested subject users, , , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Again, my skill at finding sources for non-English mobile games is not great.  But I see few hits on a WP:VG/RS Google custom search.  It's mentioned in Sony's official Playstation blog, but I don't really see anything else.  Further searches revealed little in the way of coverage in various databases, such as Metacritic.  It's possible there is Japanese-language coverage out there, and, if so, the article can be recreated (with better sourcing).  If anyone can turn up better sourcing than me, then feel free to discount my vote.  I guess what pushes me over the edge from uncertainty to deletion is that the article seems a bit promotional.  I don't see any reason why it should discuss pricing information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.