Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Application-specific standard product


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article is found to be a definition. &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 01:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Application-specific standard product

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Google search doesn't come up with much to verify notability beyond a glorified dictionary definition. Unsourced since 2006. Coin945 (talk) 04:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 04:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep ASSP is an industry term for a standardized ASIC -ref — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ne0Freedom (talk • contribs) 23:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reworked -0 this is a dicdef right now. Guy (Help!) 16:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete though it is valid and verifiable IT term, it cannot grow beyond dictionary definition/glossary. For instance this, this and this sources all defined it but as a glossary term, which can't be substantially expanded without drifting to the above topic or Integrated circuit topic in general. I already merged some worthy content.–Ammarpad (talk) 14:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I changed to delete from redirect for some reasons. 1. I already merged some salvageable content and 2. redirect from AfD are easily returned to articles without many people noticing. And also the redirect can be created with only one history which is better –Ammarpad (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:DICDEF. Title can be redirected to Application-specific integrated circuit where text has been merged. — Cactus Writer (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.