Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applied (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. slakr \ talk / 08:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Applied
AfDs for this article:
 * Articles for deletion/Applied
 * Articles for deletion/Applied (2nd nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet GNG or CORP DEPTH. Prev discussion closed as no consensus. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * delete as lacking secondary coverage. Anything useful in here can probably be merged to Legible London. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.