Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applied Biomathematics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Applied Biomathematics

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Company doesn't get significant, independent, reliable, or secondary coverage. Reference 1 doesn't refer to company. Reference 2, 3, 4, and 7 are just the company website. Reference 5 and 6 are lists of funding. Reference 8 is a link to a trademark registration. In general, this looks like a vanity or advertising page for the company. AndrewMatteson (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Shellwood (talk) 20:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Computing, Environment, Mathematics, Science,  and Software. -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count) 02:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Computing, Environment, Mathematics, Science,  and Software. -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count) 02:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nomination that there no indication of notability for this company in terms of coverage and documented achievements. This certainly has all of the appearance of a vanity or advertising page for this company. Paul H. (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I cannot find coverage of the company in even one in-depth independent source. I think, however, that their software package RAMAS is notable. I could support moving/merging to RAMAS, but almost none of the text here would be relevant on such a page, so that puts me in delete. - Astrophobe  (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.