Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Applozic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Applozic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Nothing significant but another startup company. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a software product directory. 1000s of startups happens every day. Just another one. Sources are questionable and some of them are profile created on website. Notability required repeated significant coverage by media as well as significance in itself. Light2021 (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per nom - blatantly promotional text, bad sourcing - David Gerard (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Anup   [Talk]  22:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- product brochure in the form of a Wikipedia article. WP:PROMO applies, while the subject shows no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.