Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appomattox Basin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was kind of a consensus to delete, but on the other hand there are suggestions here to redirect this to Tri-Cities, Virginia. I have looked at that article and the heading there says "also known as ... the Appomattox Basin". I am calling this a redirect there. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:09, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Appomattox Basin
This region is part of the Richmond-Petersburg region (Richmond VA MSA) which already has an article. The Tri-Cities, Virginia article has significantly more information and covers the same geographic area. MPS 18:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom MPS 18:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this article is totally rendundant and less informative than the other articles about the area. Vaoverland 22:13, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * How about we change it to a redirect to Tri-Cities, Virginia? Vaoverland 04:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)


 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 14:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per the fact that I trust Vaoverland's opinions on issues relating to the geography of Virginia. Youngamerican 19:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge/redirect, valid topic that should be discussed in Wikipedia. Christopher Parham (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The "Appomatox Basin" article is intended to be a geographic area, not a geological feature. Like Manhattan Island or the Outer Banks of North carolina, the Appomatox Basin is a description of a region that is essentially identical to the Tri-Cities, Virginia area. If you want to talk about slope the river basin etc, this information can be contained in Appomattox River. Reconsider? MPS 00:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Hence, "or merge/redirect." Christopher Parham (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - the encycl;opaedic content of the article is so much smaller than the surrounding furniture (including the regional template) as to be ridiculous. I believe Vaoverland is well versed on this area's coverage in WP and so rather than vote merge, I support delete. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 14:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.