Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appropriation (music) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Appropriation (music)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just a complete mess. Normal criteria would suggest there's an article in there somewhere, but wouldn't it be better just to start again? Mcewan (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Cut out the unsourced essay-like rambling and you'd have nothing. If there is a topic here, then WP:TNT is the only possible choice. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 08:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Until someone will find scholarly topics about this (very real) subject, as it is: delete.Trillfendi (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rambling WP:ESSAY, largely unsourced and, where sourced, largely inappropriately. Musical influence is indeed potentially a serious subject (although the term 'appropriation' is itself loaded - it is only one aspect of musical influence) but the article is self-indulgent and poorly informed. The very first sentence "Appropriation in Western music as a economic phenomenon" sets the non-encyclopedic tone, and the rest is a drone supporting that opinion.--Smerus (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.