Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppsDesignLab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

AppsDesignLab

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software, failing WP:PRODUCT as no coverage in independent, third-party reliable sources. The only sources are either self-sourced, WP:PRIMARY, zines/blogs/storefronts, or social media, including YouTube, Twitter, etc. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  08:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable software per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 02:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article lacks significant content and lacks credible sources. Bmbaker88 (talk) 22:08, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 13:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.