Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2005 in Hong Kong and Macao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 02:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

April 2005 in Hong Kong and Macao

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I really don't see how this article is notable enough to have its own page, it should be deleted or at the very least merged with the main event by month page; i.e. April 2005 I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same WP:N reason:
 * Tavatar (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * (missed one)Tavatar (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Tavatar (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * (missed one)Tavatar (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  —Tavatar (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks very much like a Wikinews-ish feed, which isn't appropriate here - and some of the entries were never updated as they happened (see April 2005, for example). Are there other articles for the remaining months? It's possible that an article 2005 in Hong Kong and Macao would be worthwhile as a summary, esp. if notable things took place during that year. If the author(s?) were still working on it, or the following months, then userfication might be an option as well - but the creator, User:J3ff, has not edited since July. So, absent another option, I'd have to say delete. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 16:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all such articles. WP is not a newspaper. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. WP:SNOW close. Bearian (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.