Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Carrión


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6). Tone 22:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

April Carrión

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is not independently notable outside of Ru Paul's Drag Race and does not meet general, entertainer, or biographies notability guidelines. Attempts to restore redirect to Drag Race have been undone and so I am seeking community consensus that Carrion is not yet notable and the redirect should be restored. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Barkeep49. Searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have not assessed notability or secondary coverage, but if the subject is deemed not notable, the page should be redirected to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6), not deleted. The redirect serves a purpose. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree and hope I made that clear in my nomination. Best, Barkeep49 (talk)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I have told you multiple times that the sources I gave for this person ARE reliable and you have completely ignored their other appearances in the documentary, music video, etc. so the claim that their only notable for Drag Race is straight up incorrect. Plus their social media following, and lower placing and lower successful queens from the show have pages, there is no reason this is not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - minor appearances with no significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There are over 20 sources in the references section, so no, there is significant coverage to the article. I don't know what you're on about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.