Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Wilkerson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. passes GNG, sources are reliable (non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

April Wilkerson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a vanity article with promotional links. The specified person is one of many youtubers  DGG ( talk ) 16:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep The nominator's supposed reasons (vanity, one of many, etc) are not grounds for deletion. Wilkerson is a successful YouTuber with millions of views on YouTube with plenty of coverage in traditional media which are reliable and in-depth, with coverage of her life and her projects such as in Popular Mechanics and also here with coverage here and even international coverage and also here in Australia and in Woodworkers Journal. Notable person who clearly meets the general notability guideline.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 10:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:21, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep She has been profiled in RS for her work. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete none of the sources submitted are substantial, all just a few sentences saying someone showed how to do something.--Alizaa2 (talk) 14:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Popular Mechanics, LA Daily News, and Lifehacker Australia are reliable sources.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.