Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aproplan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Aproplan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Largely cited to Aproplan sources; what other sources exist seem to be of the press release variety. Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP or the WP:GNG. GorillaWarfare (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. –  TheGridExe  ( talk )  15:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. –  TheGridExe  ( talk )  19:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - The TechCrunch article looks like the best source currently used in the article, but it's not very in-depth. There might be better sources in Dutch or French, since this is a Belgian company. clpo13(talk) 23:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. I found the corresponding French article fr:Aproplan and made an Interwiki link. There is no article in Dutch Wikipedia. The French article includes three sources, all of which are already in the English article. (The French article is tagged with the Interwiki-linked equivalents of Primary sources, Advert, Notability and Orphan. The Produit (=Products) section is tagged as a sales catalogue (no exact English equivalent). The article is also semi-protected (3 months on Wiki and 500 edits, I'm 480 short of that; no exact English equivalent), but I had no intention of editing it anyway.)


 * I searched, but couldn't find anything beyond self-publications and what look like press releases. I am unimpressed by the techcrunch citation, which looks like a "would you like to interview us?" article. I am comfortable with both Dutch and French, but found nothing better in either language. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Narky Blert (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 16:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.