Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apse (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ҥ (talk) 10:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Apse (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability tagged since 2009, so time to get a hearing on this. One-paragraph AllMusic bio. There's some coverage in Prog Archives, but it's listed as unreliable at WP:ALBUMAVOID. Sources in the article are primary, unreliable, or insignificant coverage. Mostly just an interview here. This is from BBC, but is marked as a Wikipedia mirror. Sputnik gives one sentence. The material here is copied from the lead of this article. Found a few things that look bloggish. Don't think this quite meets WP:NBAND (one release on an indie label with an article, others either self-released or on really minor indie labels), and I'm not sure that WP:GNG is met, either. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - Likely COI, as created by User:Apse. Hog Farm Bacon 02:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Comment If the article was created by a user whose name matches the band's, then it is not "likely" COI, it IS COI. Just saying. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 09:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep the AllMusic bio has a large number of facts that sources much of the article and there is also a staff written album review here Will look for more sources tomorrow, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC) The undertheradar magazine piece is partially a review of an album but be careful at that site as it has malware, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Update found extra reliable sources coverage at Pitchfork here, Clash here, more Clash coverage indexed here,Exclaim here, PopMatters here,More reviews linked at Metacritic here, and More reviews linked at Metacritic for a different album here. All together there is enough coverage for WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 13:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per Atlantic's work. Caro7200 (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pamzeis (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Atlantic. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 08:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.