Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AptEdit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

AptEdit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable text editing software. Google turns up nothing other than various download mirrors; time for the chop, methinks. Ironholds (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep AptEdit is a windows software released from 2006. It can view and edit any file, even a disk. &mdash;Chengwenhua 0:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That doesn't give it notability, that gives it workability. Ironholds (talk) 02:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. A google search shows lots of download links, but no coverage about the software such as a product review.  A search on PC Magazine and ZDNet turn up no indication of reviews or coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 20:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - a straightforward advertisement by its author with no attempt to establish notability Tedickey (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Tedickey. Doesn't establish notability, just promotes the product. Mvjs   Talking  10:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. Advertisement of an unnotable product. — Fatal Error 07:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * SpeedyDelete - as per WP:SD (G11), WP:SPAM and WP:N policy - DustyRain (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem to qualify for G11. The articles content isn't spamtastic per se; having a product as its subject and a COI isn't really enough. Ironholds (talk) 10:21, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.