Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apurva Chamaria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Apurva Chamaria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NonNotable Indian Businessman. Vice Presidents are never notable

Reads like a Linkedin profile. WP:Promotional Uncletomwood (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete He is a non-notable businessman. There are possibly some cases where a vice president in a business is notable, but this is not such a case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILL, WP:NOTRESUME, and WP:UPANDCOMING. The subject lacks significant coverage in multiple sources, which is required of all BLPs. All business VPs post on LinkedIn and try to get published in an economist-type magazine, especially marketing mavens like the subject. We are not a place to post this person's resume, which is more of what this is than a real article. He's up-and-coming like lots of people in business; when he actually makes it big, we can re-create an article for him. Bearian (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a non notable corporate executive. No indications of notability except for being associated with a corporation. The searches do not bring up anything substantial. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.