Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua's 2010 album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Icewedge (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Aqua's 2010 album
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. WP:HAMMER. Few details, sources are from fan sites and recording hasn't even started Wolfer68 (talk) 18:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER, no reliable info yet. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 19:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources seem highly unreliable. WP:CRYSTAL violation. Not enough information to warrant an article anyways. talking  birds  19:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL. See also WP:HAMMER.  Only an announcement from the band exists.  Recreate later when there's some actual release info and it's notable per WP:NALBUMS. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to Aqua (band) - textbook WP:HAMMER as the man himself has already pointed out. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Potential Merge/Delete. The band itself is notable, however, as pointed out, fails WP:HAMMER, WP:NALBUMS (and thus WP:CRYSTAL).  Provided that some reliable sources can be found (I am unconvinced that those cited are reliable), then I don't see why some of the information can't be merged into the Aqua article.  When/once it is released, I'm pretty confident it would be notable, but considering there isn't even a tracklisting yet, it's too premature.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  00:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS: no release date, no title, no track list. Insufficient verified information to warrant its own article.  WP:HAMMERTIME indeed.  Cliff smith  talk  06:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the hammer - announcing that it will be made does not equal notability. I would go through the other stuff, but it was announced less than two months ago, so it wouldn't have any. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. Rlendog (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Or perhaps merge with Aqua (band). Rlendog (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - The recording may not have started yet, but that is because the band announced that they will start recording it in 2010 and they will release it in the same year, so maybe we should just leave the article like this. BulsaraAndDeacon (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This is actually the reason it should be deleted. See WP:CRYSTAL. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 00:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.