Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Aqua Jones

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

previously speedily deleted, recreated page still lacks 3rd party references, band has not received significant coverage. RadioFan (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - it is still being completed, I'd say give the article a bit more time before deleting. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 23:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Delete - Pretty sure this doesn't have a chance. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 23:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - band is hardly going to become notable in the near fixture.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:12, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Neutral in respect with underconstruction tag, however, a cursory google search / news check turned up nothing useful in terms of reliable third party sources. Will change my vote to keep if sources turn up within a reasonable timeframe, delete otherwise. MLauba (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I speedy deleted it the first time because it failed to make a clear assertion of notability. It still doesn't; the only notability claimed is in a local area. I don't see anything that meets WP:BAND, and there are no independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 23:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Searching finds no significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. Just another facebook/myspace/garage band. Hell, garageband.com is one of their external links.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 23:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pleas see my talk page for a discussion with the main contributing editor; he provided references (that are not in the article yet afaik) that show notability. I will check again in a couple weeks to see how it is coming along. Note that this reverts my previous "CSD" tag that precluded this AfD. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 23:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - should have been Speedy Delete. No claim of notability. No reliable references. Untick (talk) 01:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete --NN garage band, no major labels, tours, or coverage. Ronabop (talk)
 * Delete: trivial coverage, no awards, no charts, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above.Nrswanson (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 15:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.