Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquadon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect. Mifter (talk) 04:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Aquadon
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Last AfD closed as "merge". No merge was performed the last 7 months because there is nothing to merge from this. There are hundreds of Zoids and the text is mainly original research. A google search for "Aquadon -wiki" shows that there is NOTHING about this Zoid. Redirect was reverted as "unnecessary". Magioladitis (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  13:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect - It looks like many of the other reversions of "unnecessary redirects" done by the anonymous IP editor have since been restored and have stuck. --EEMIV (talk) 13:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've gone through and restored several of the other redirects -- some of which the IP editor reverted despite AfD consensus for a redirect. --EEMIV (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. After you comments I looked more carefully and I noticed that an anonymous IP did mass reversions recently. Of course the question remains. Are we planning to have a redirect for every single Zoid? Are you planning ot do the same for every single footballer as well? Because, I think some Zoids are really insignificant and sometimes made-up. Check the last reversion (and the whole edit history) in List of Zoids -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete then redirect - content is all unsourced and poorly written. Nothing worth keeping. Savidan 17:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.