Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquamarine (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   WP:SNOW Keep. Non-admin closure. Joe Chill (talk) 19:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Aquamarine (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recent film, not notable, no WP:RS Spectre9 (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per this Google News Archive search. This film passes the notability guidelines per this news article from Deseret News, this one from WalesOnline, etc. Cunard (talk) 05:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep A major Hollywood film always has automatic notability.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily passes WP:NFILMS, with several reviews, notable director, notable producer, notable writers, at least three notable actors). I have suggested withdrawal of nomination to the nominator. decltype (talk) 07:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as a major Hollywood film. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 08:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close it is a major film released in 2006 and it is a financial success. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 11:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously notable, nomination is puzzling.  Wasted Time R (talk) 11:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per comments above. Notable film.--Cube lurker (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:NFILMS.  young  american  (wtf?) 13:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy and Snow keep. You can't seriously look at the external links and claim this film is not notable and has no reliable sources. -- RUL3R *flaming 14:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy, snow. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.