Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquarium therapy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i SPEAK!! 00:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Aquarium therapy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Lots of unsupported claims for the benefits of fish keeping. The article is full of weasel words with no references. I have brought it to deletion debate as I am not sure if it includes anything worth savings. Malcolma (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Weak Keep Agree that's it's in bad shape. I found a couple of references with quick google search. I'll see if I can find some more and do some editing to shape it up. Nuujinn (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The benefits have been well studied and reported. I have added a citation but AFD is not cleanup.  Please see WP:BEFORE.  Colonel Warden (talk) 08:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Has some sources. That should be enough to keep it. Problematic unsourced statements can just be removed. Dew Kane (talk) 04:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and Rewrite It is a mess, but the references are fine. Warrah (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Please take another look I've done some major edits and added some sources. Nuujinn (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.