Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquascape, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Aquascape, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note - This entry above is part of the nomination, and is not an !vote. Northamerica1000 (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why state the obvious and follow it by a meaningless and inaccurate double negative? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * A nomination is basically a !vote, as I was told once. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 09:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This business makes fountains and such for water gardens and ponds.  No showing of significant effects on history, technology, or culture of the kind that would make it a subject for coverage in an encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.