Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquasyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -Djsasso (talk) 23:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Aquasyn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable Excariver (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Gavin Collins (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, despite the oddly stunted in the nom, this company doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC).


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, delete - notability not supported by article itself or a quick google search. Company is real and article appears legit, just doesn't establish notability.Wikidemo (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.