Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquatic organism passage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Aquatic organism passage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The term exists, but itself isn't the topic of substantial coverage. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article basically says the subject refers to the ability of aquatic things to pass through barriers; the self-explanatory definition is implicit wherever the phrase is used in publications. After the definition, this article proceeds to discuss culverts, which already has its own article. In fact, the topic of passage is already covered there. JFHJr (㊟) 20:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. It is a poor article name and the info is elsewhere as stated by the nominator. Note that we also have Fish barrier, Fish ladder and Environmental impact of reservoirs articles. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  20:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks reliable sources and Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.