Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquiris Game Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Aquiris Game Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N. I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. Tried searching using the WP:VG reliable and situational custom Google searches, plus a general Google search. The company certainly exists and is listed by BloombergBusiness, but coverage is limited to primary sources (especially press releases), unreliable sources like forums and user-submitted game databases, and trivial mentions as a developer of similarly non-notable games. Woodroar (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  Woodroar (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - while this is written fairly nicely and neutrally (hence the weak), the sourcing needed to establish notability just doesn't seem to be there, as stated above. The sources to be found are promotional or too closely related to the subject. I even browsed through some Google Brazil search results to no avail. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 19:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm actually leaning more towards delete now, because it appears the editor who started the article may have a conflict of interest. A company shouldn't have an article until it can meet the notability requirements, and that shouldn't be affected by outside forces. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Weaker Delete In contrast with the nominator, the studio has in fact made notable games, namely Horizon Chase. This, though is in contrast with the lack of significant coverage of the studio itself. Coverage such as this and a large variety of mentions in coverage of Horizon Chase helps, but it does not establish GNG passing notability. Winner 42 Talk to me!  22:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak but delete for now as this may have potential and may get better coverage later but my searches found nothing particularly good now with this, this and this being the best results. At best, I'd say draft 7 userfy for now. SwisterTwister   talk  05:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.