Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ara Paiaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Ara Paiaya

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

all sources insanely trivial mentions. all others found were similarly trivial. ltb d l (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ltb d  l (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As required by the guideline, he has played an important role (mostly, directing) in the creation of at least one notable film having received coverage. His role as director is noted (in general negatively) for various films (examples:, , etc.) if that was necessary. (those mentions are generally not extensive but that is not necessary in this case)- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  14:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @mushy yank: what guideline? ltb d l (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:DIRECTOR - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  07:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I just watched one of his films (Night Driver) on Amazon Prime (UK). Isn't availability of his material on that platform enough to make him notable? REVOL 17:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by REVOL (talk • contribs)
 * No. Notability is determined by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject giving signicant coverage. -- Mike 🗩 19:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

A name being listed does not meet WP:SIGCOV. BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS, with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and INDEPTH.  // Timothy :: talk  08:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Source eval:
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 00:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - B-movie professional but has enough cover to support in my opinion. https://www.proquest.com/docview/334022315/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/17, https://www.proquest.com/docview/1693478955/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/20, https://www.proquest.com/docview/334090449/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/8, https://www.proquest.com/docview/328440351/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/5, https://www.proquest.com/docview/339476412/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/4, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2765662491/Record/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/2, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2785550373/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/1 - Indefensible (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.