Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab Sheikh child marriage racket of Hyderabad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Split consensus with deletion, and this achieves that goal since there is thought that there might be merit here. The original editor might or might not come back to it, but if they don't, G13 solves this in six months. Star  Mississippi  17:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Arab Sheikh child marriage racket of Hyderabad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Whatever I have written was sourced. Maybe the article is not written properly, I am not editing for long time, and using proper headings, sub headings, infobox, categories, sections, I don't have experience in that.

All lines are sourced and proper coverage is given for years. Please check the sources and decide. More user's views are required. Rambo XTerminator (talk) 07:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

As there were many sources, I managed to give the source of most lines just after that line, but in one sentence, I did not give the source just after that. That source is in the article, but I don't remember which source. The title could be changed. I believe in Wikipedia, other editors should work together to develop an article, not just harass other editors by drafting well-sourced articles. I cannot develop the article more, as I don't have time and lack of experience. Rambo XTerminator (talk) 07:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

These are the refernces used. Which one is bad reference? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arab_Sheikh_child_marriage_racket_of_Hyderabad&oldid=1136619075 Rambo XTerminator (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to see what the support is for Drafting the article and if anyone wants to take that project on. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - There is an article to be written about the topic, but this essay is not it. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify per TrangaBellam. And I'd advise the article creator (who seems to have nominated their own article for deletion, possibly in error) to either spend more time finding out how the English-language Wikipedia works, how it differs from sub-tabloid media, and why it doesn't cite such sources, or to find a Wikipedia version in a language they are more competent in. AndyTheGrump (talk) 09:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @AndyTheGrump You might be interested in this thread. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that. Part of the reason for my comment. See also Stray dog attacks in India, which suffers from the same tabloid-style sensationalism, poor sourcing etc. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not going to edit this article anymore, which means this will be deleted. I saw in other user's talk page, that stale draft is deleted. If this has notability, why can't other editors improve it from the sources? Rambo XTerminator (talk) 10:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Telangana.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, draft please. This needs work. Oaktree b (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - the style is all wrong, the references apparently refer to an incident in 2017 rather than a wider issue as suggested in the text. JMWt (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per original author's request if they're not going to improve the article further. Only other non-template edit by another user was to merely link Hyderabad, so deletion should be non-controversial.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As TrangaBellam says RS in the article may pass GNG for a stub. RS seems okay under Transnational marriage titles.  If TrangaBellam takes over the draft development then that would be great, other wise just note down references links @ Talk:Transnational marriage and delete. &#32;Bookku    (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Halfly cooked article. Valiaveetil (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC) (Sock strike — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC))
 * Note to closing administrator -JMWt did not check all sources properly. The article should be added with infobox and divided into sections and subsections, see also section. There are multiple sources from The Hindu, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Deccan Chronicle, Calcutta Telegraph with deep coverage. Andy The Grump should comment on keep or delete, not tell someone to move into different Wikipedia in AFD votes. Thousands of stub articles exist in Wikipedia. Many articles have zero sources. Millions of articles use media sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.105.3.219 (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I have little doubt that the closer will be familiar with Wikipedia policy. Since you appear not to be, I suggest you rectify that before offering advice. And read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * In the same article, also read WP:MAJORITY ("As per Trangabellam" type comments), WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC (Your comment), and WP:LOUSYTITLE. 42.105.2.53 (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Rename to Transnational marriages in Muslim world I wish to change my opinion to rename sorry what is the procedure. I changed my opinion after coming across this Research paper ".. Duman, T. (2020). The Situation of Syrian Women in Turkey. In: Carlson, E.D., Williams, N.E. (eds) Comparative Demography of the Syrian Diaspora: European and Middle Eastern Destinations. European Studies of Population, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24451-4_5 .."


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.