Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arabian goggles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete

Arabian goggles
Speedied once as (appropriately enough) complete bollocks, was linked from Dutch blindfold (recently AfDd and deleted). The article makes it perfectly plain it's a protologism, lacks reliable sources etc. I'd speedy it as a repost but it has been somewhat expanded since original deletion and is now no longer "patent nonsense" but instead simply nonsense. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 10:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. MLA 11:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 12:57, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete My guess is that this was created as a place to put that gaming clan link, since most gaming clans are speedied or quickly AfDed. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's possible that it is a sexual slang term, but it doesn't seem to be a popular one. I agree with Andrew Lenahan. -- Mithent 13:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete recreation of previously deleted article. Elfguy 14:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as Complete bollocks. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-02-08 15:44Z 
 * Delete per nom. Avi 16:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Is this a joke? Delete ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  20:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Blnguyen 23:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)\
 * KEEPJust because you've never experienced or heard of it, doesnt mean it should be deleted. What is the difference between this and 'Dirty Sanchez'. They are very similiar, only one has grown in popularity faster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.8.84 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete this is not worth an entry Jordanmills 18:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't know about encyclopedia-worthiness but the term as such seems to exist. Google for related to find more of the same. Not suitable for minors nor should be read with a full stomach. Weregerbil 00:57, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or at least add this entry onto a similar page... why have seperate pages for all this bizarre sexual slang??? Create one page for them all....
 * Keep it Just because the act of Arabian Goggles is a bit far fetched or unappealing does not mean that the terminology is not real. If one were to google the term, he or she will find multiple references to it from several independent sources.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.