Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arachibutyrophobia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No Consensus. However, between delete and merge, I see it best to merge and add Arachibutyrophobia to the Phobia list.Voice of All  @ | Esperanza | E M   02:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Arachibutyrophobia
del. Silly coinage "arachis+butter+phobia". mikka (t) 19:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to exist .  If there is a relevant merge target, that would be preferable, though. Sonic Mew | talk to me 20:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * It appear to exist among happy bloggers and snake oil peddlers:
 * Take Action Now
 * We have never met a case of Arachibutyrophobia that could not be overcome using these methods. So please, whether or not you decide to work with us, make a decision to get over Arachibutyrophobia now. If you trust us to help you, we offer two ways:
 * Our premium 'VIP' One-on-One service,
 * Working one-on-one with one of our team, with guaranteed lifetime elimination of Arachibutyrophobia. From $1,497 and up.
 * Oh, yeah, baby! I aint afraid peanut butter no more! mikka (t) 21:37, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Also I suggest you to master google a bit more. Take a look at this: not 17,000 hits but 400, and each and every of them is a laughable source for an encyclopedia. mikka (t)
 * ' Weak Transwiki' to Wiktionary. Whether the word is an "acceptable" name for a phobia or not (and I note Triskaidekaphobia has a perfectly respectable article) this is no more than a dicdef with a picture of some peanut butter. It's not by any stretch of the imagination an encyclopædic article. Tonywalton | Talk 22:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Or better, Speedy Merge and Redirect to -phobia which already has a list. Pognophobia (fear of beards) is a good precedent, and -phobia already contains the wise words:
 * In many cases people have coined these words as neologisms, and only a few of them occur in the medical literature. In many cases, the naming of phobias has become a word game.' Tonywalton | Talk 22:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Why better? neologisms are out; it is a well-established rule of wikipedia. No reason to collect nonnotable stuff. Notability is a must for everything in wikipedia. Also wikipedia is not a dictionary. These phobias even do not grade for a technical slang, which would warrant a glossary, like Glossary of ballet terms. mikka (t) 01:03, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete unless someone can verify a single diagnosed case of this. -- Corvus 04:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * It seems to exist. But the article is really just list material.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.