Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aradial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 12:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Aradial

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. All links on the page are either from company itself or are news releases. My own searches turned up nothing about the company. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I see no better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  04:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - corp article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in RS sources. A search turned up incidental mentions including IT News Africa but no singificiant independent coverage.Dialectric (talk) 18:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

=
=

Why did you Aradial - it is a company like Aptilo, Alepo, Amdocs and entitled to be on Wikipidia! why arent you removing these (also were referenced in our publication).

We also paid continuations to Wikipedia, I see this is a monopoly with unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oe2k (talk • contribs) 10:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)