Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arakasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Arakasi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable minor character. No coverage that I can find in independent reliable sources. Normally I would suggest a redirect for this type of article, but in this case I don't think the character is even a plausible search term. Jenks24 (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Non-notable character from a series of novels. Redirect as a character's name is a plasible search term. --Madison-chan (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * To which article? Jenks24 (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I thought there was a List of The Empire Trilogy characters page already. You should be bold and create that page and merge this character there. --Madison-chan (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If someone created a List of The Empire Trilogy characters article, then I'd be happy for a redirect (note, not a merge because there's no referenced content). Jenks24 (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to a yet-to-be-created character list, presumably including most or all of the other characters listed on the article's nav template. Jclemens (talk) 03:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, all other characters in that navbox do not actually appear in the same series as Arakasi. Also, a merge is not possible at the moment, as there is no referenced content. Jenks24 (talk) 06:15, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as completely unreferenced page with no encyclopedic content. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.