Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aram Alnashéa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kubigula (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Aram Alnashéa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am having difficulty finding sufficient indicia of notability of this 21-year-old DJ, music producer, label owner, and song writer. Others are welcome to try. Tagged for notability since early 2010. Also tagged as an orphan since 2010, as zero articles link to it. Epeefleche (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep -but only so that someone with more knowledge about this "artist" will have the opportunity to re-write this article so it doesnt look like a CV for a atelyperson.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, that is not a valid reason to retain a non-notable article.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I couldn't find any significant coverage or any reliable sources covering the subject.--Michig (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. I have added many references to the article, in answer to the colleague Michig. Also rectified the tone and some of the non-encyclopedic claims of the article. I also think the article should be under Stana (DJ) rather than Aram Alnashéa werldwayd (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, none of the sources that you added appear to constitute significant independent coverage in reliable sources, which will be needed to demonstrate notability.--Michig (talk) 23:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  17:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete. Even the "improved" article fails to convince me there is anything notable about this person. Michig is quite right when he says that the added sources do not constitute RS, but the article itself does not really suggest that any such sources can even exist. Why should they? Look at some of the detail: "When he turned 18 he released his first record" - did anyone buy it? "He has also released tracks..." Did anyone buy them? "He had his first international gig in England" = he appeared in England (did anyone go?). "developing himself as an international DJ" = see previous. "The British magazine Core Mag named him in September 2009 as one of the newcomers in the Hard Dance scene" = so what, he was a newcomer. Was he any good? Who says so? Again and again this article seeks to boost by innuendo the status of someone who, if we look to reliable sorces, doesn't break the horizon. Emeraude (talk) 23:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Im still standing by my Keep !vote.. nothing in this AfD discussion has convinced me that this article shouldnt be kept. Or at the least been kept via a No Consensus for now.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * werldwayds added references convinced me even further that this article should be kept.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * References do not support a keep determination, if they are not significant independent coverage in reliable sources, which we do not have here.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 15:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree that the minimum standard of extensive independent coverage has not been met in this case, even with improvements. Dawn Bard (talk) 23:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The improvements to the article convince me that this is a working DJ, but not one that currently meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. -- Whpq (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.