Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Aranye Maniac Killer Mystery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An amateur short film posted to YouTube with no coverage in non-self-published or independent reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM. This is one of several articles by an SPA account promoting the same individuals. (E.g. Sudhu Tomari (Telefilm 2013) and Manab (Music Video 2016)), — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  Cactus Writer (talk) 17:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —  Cactus Writer (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Sources to meet WP:NFP have not been found; delete per WP:DEL8. — Sam Sailor 17:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This is not an amateur short film or non-self-published. its a independent short bengali film its not to promot anyone, theirs many publicity and talk about the film, its film made from golden life institute, only notability in their place, wikipedia is for collect information's from around the world not to delete genuine articles without no reason, only they found their reliable source, which is impossible for an independent maker or real talented peoples which fail for rich coverage. the articles all source are in google, the short film are exits & all characters, credits are exits with those reference. so i request to not delete my contribution without check the articles ref, & cast, credits, youtube source. (Sudhu Tomari (Telefilm 2013) and Manab (Music Video 2016)) theirs are so many many articles, pages which neither have any source or single publicity, or in reliable sites, or non of many peoples didnt hear about them abut they still in wikipedia. why dont nominated them? -- Yudishina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 18:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)  — Note to closing admin: Yudisina (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * For an answer to your question, please read Other stuff exists. — Cactus Writer (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep My articles are all 100% exits, and still have reference, CactusWriter you only nominate my articles for delete, those are notible in my city Jhargram. I also seen many articles in wikipedia without any proper reference. but still exits.. dont make it revenge. wikipedia is for everyone can write about things which exits, and genuine true. so Request to keep my articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 05:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Ambox warning pn.svg — Duplicate vote: Yudisina (talk • contribs)  has already cast a vote above.
 * Have a read on the essay Existence ≠ Notability; everyone can write on Wikipedia, yes, but we can not write about everything. — Sam Sailor 16:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion No reason for deletion my creation page, its a short film. please check the reference of others source in the article page. the film is exits & its a low budget short film. many of others sites have reference not only same user page. wikipedia is for collect information's from all around the world. there is no rules i violate. i only contribute a film page. which i request to save and keep not to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Yudisina (talk • contribs) 00:54, 3 February 2017 Yudisina (UTC)
 * I have looked at each of the references posted (and searched for others). Not a single one of these meet encyclopedic standards for "significant coverage by independent reliable sources." For example, the one you list above is a non-notable webblog that advertises itself for self-promotion by amateur filmmakers. All of the others are self-submitted promotional websites, including a self-published poetry blog that has nothing to do with film and a self-published advertising website. Lack of coverage is not unusual for an amateur film that the article states was made through a student workshop and released on YouTube. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion No, NOT SELF PUBLISHED. User:CactusWriter Please can you cut the word,?? I say clearly true nothing lie. Im publishing this article as a contributer coz i am a manager of the movie production, And i am the one who reporting a fake user page in wikipedia to make wikipedia clean & better. No one here self published their self, the non-notable webblog published our film for them self not we or any of our member telling for published. if not believe, then go ask the owner of site., You pointing all sites, blogs are self published? how can anyone can submitted like that, CAN YOU PUBLISHED?? Just published a single reference in any self blog or what you call self prompt sites. They are promoted by their self, you can or google the actor Rajkumar Patra, not famous or could be no coverage in news but well known, please google him. he is in the film, Its not enough? .. so we have 100 of reference & well notable. I Have collect some sites..  Please check - [] (THIS IS NOT SELF PUBLISHED DATABASE, ITS ALSO WRITE ON WIKIPEDIA]], the film also listed here.  (BIG STOCK ITS ALSO IN WIKIPEDIA)  , (AMAZON IS NOT SELF PUBLISHED) Icche_Dana ON WIKIPEDIA ALREADY ALSO , , , , ,
 * I Checked and submit those reference, non of ref is self published. there lots of 100 of web reference have. Please note- those ref are for the actor who acted & directed alos in Sudhu_Tomari_(Telefilm_2013) Which also nominate for delectation with lack of news reference. Those are tele/short films which doesn't need to news coverage. But those films are locally popular & also screening. So your make an so many excuse to delete articles. Already my hard writing one article deleted. (SAD) So please check the film article once again before deleted. Thats my request to you & editors and the Administer. Aranye is low budget movie but its has rights to be in wikipedia. And also i say again there are many wikis on wikipedia which have lack of reference or removed from news pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 14:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Yudsina, please read Identifying reliable sources. None of the links you have posted above are independent reliable sources. Note that IMDb is appropriate as an external link, but it is not generally considered a reliable source. (See External links/Perennial websites) Big Stock is a user-submitted website (for example, see here). All the advertising/promotion websites are user-submitted and are not reliable sources for the purpose of an encyclopedic article. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion All are not reliable? but all are have reliability, all are in media & viral. the film is exits, its not the thing that is is fake article. Okay, i agree with you that the film had no coverage like that, but not agree that you always said self published & not reliable film. i say before those films are locally promoted & well know like in Jhargram. you editors are making excuse to delete my hard writing articles. User:CactusWriter please give the links where you want to see the review of the film? remember we are bengali industry in india. i knw what news you taling about. like news papers, and times of india! right?? but i say before my articles are about low budget films, there no need to promote by self published on news papers. I requested to try to save one of my article contribution. please brief me a little in west bengal which news paper coverage is good to reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 04:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Low-budget (about $1000) amateur production with unknown actors looking for free publicity. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong Argument Keep as per, it was low budget but not amateur, the film with good concept and story, one actor was known for previous works, i already said but i dont know why my argument are ignored? objection is for that no one actors are looking for publicity. the film is already added in imdb, & also in several web directory's. Locally know short film not needed any big publicity, just a short film. a normal delectation discussion running for 7 days but its past ten days, no discussion will be taken? articles are still have, Once again i deeply request to keep my article coz its dont have any reason for delectation, could be in future we can get many source for the meantime save and keep Aranye_Maniac_Killer_Mystery_(2014_Short_Film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 10:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources in the article are actually reliable, and the film fails WP:NFILM. Notability requires coverage in independent reliable sources, which I could not find any. GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 02:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong Argument Keep, sources in the article are actually from unreliable but keep as per the film is locally notable & not been promoted in news papers, but none of are self published, first time shooting short film in jhargram forest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yudisina (talk • contribs) 05:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.