Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aras Corp (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. This AFD nomination was probably doomed from the beginning as it was started by a sockpuppet and the low participation after 2 relistings has left this nomination again as No Consensus. Here's hoping though that no one starts up a 6th AFD any time soon. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Aras Corp
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Poorly sourced advertisement. No sources to help with WP:NCORP. Not notable software company. Driodr (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC) UPE spammer strike. MER-C 19:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software,  and Massachusetts.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting. The reason why there are so many AFDs for this article is that editors keep nominating it for deletion. Previous AFDs had Keep or No Consensus closure so so far there has been no consensus to Delete this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't know why we have had to go through this so many times.  The company obviously fails WP:CORPDEPTH.  There's a Boston Globe article about it that's fundamentally local interest (and so reliant on interviews I think it's dependent!), and not a ton else out there besides.  This is a perma-stub; there's nothing to say about this company.  It's just not notable.  FalconK (talk) 02:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:ORG per the sources provided in evidence in the other previous AFDs. Without an WP:ORGCRIT analysis table (see WP:SIRS) presented by the nominator of all the sources not just in the article currently, but presented as evidence in the previous AFDs, I am not seeing a valid reason to overturn prior consensus that the company passes WP:CORPDEPTH. There is a reason this company has passed four previous AFDs, and no new argument has been presented here that hasn't already been successfully refuted in the other discussions. In other words, do the work and say something new, or this discussion isn't likely to end up with a different conclusion. 4meter4 (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.