Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arash Estilaf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 16:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Arash Estilaf

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete the coverage is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think there's enough Chinese-language coverage to meet WP:GNG.
 * 谢谢你带给我的精彩——伊朗演员华波波在中国的成长故事 – a detailed news profile
 * 杨迪口中的“万人嫌”是如何成功上位的？ – another profile
 * 《非正式会谈》五季元老华波波太红了，这些热播剧里都有他的身影 – discusses his appearance in various TV shows
 * Expats roll up their sleeves to help others – English-language news article with some information about Estilaf and his popularity
 * 新万家灯火华波波扮演者意外走红 人称加戏王出场自带笑点 – about his appearance in another TV show, with some biographical information
 * 《笑傲江湖》复赛 观察员奇装异服亮相 – information about his appearance on a reality show
 * 《非正2》男神也动怒 华波波引公愤被挡脸 – coverage of his appearance on a talk show
 * 亲爱的热爱的华波波是哪一集 亲爱的热爱的华波波演的谁 – coverage of his appearance on Go Go Squid!
 * 土耳其“数据帝”登录《非正式会谈》 – coverage of his appearance on Informal Talks
 * 《非正式会谈》：IT10揭秘眼中的对方 – has a brief introduction and some information about Estilaf
 * That's in addition to the two China Daily pieces already cited in the article. I'm sure a more thorough search would turn up more sources, but I think these are enough for GNG. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Per sources given by Granger. Jumpytoo Talk 23:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources above are enough for WP:GNG. Especially this one Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'd withdraw this nom, based on 's sourcing above, but can't since there is a delete !vote.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per sources given by Granger. VocalIndia (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per available sources it passes WP:GNG. DmitriRomanovJr (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.