Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arash Hosseini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Arash Hosseini

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:PROD; restoring for deletion discussion. Other than his qualifications the only cited material is cited to the subject's own websites, and the tone is so promotional it almost qualifies as spam. &#8209; Iridescent 12:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC) (adding) I've removed some of the more obvious promotion and padding. &#8209; Iridescent 12:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails to demonstrate notability. Pahlevun (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources are clearly not independent and fail in establishing the subject's notability. This is a promotional article on a run of the mill businessperson. RetiredDuke  19:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - or even speedy delete, because, while the article asserts a claim of significance, I don't see that it asserts any credible claim of significance as required to avoid WP:A7 deletion. I wouldn't object to moving the article to draft space for improvement and AFC submission if notability can be proven. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * speedy delete, because soureces and references are not enough for this article at all Leodikap (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * @Leodikap, just out of curiosity what speedy deletion criterion applies here? Even if an article contains sources that's never been a CSD reason. &#8209; Iridescent 15:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.