Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbetarbladet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep: nomination withdrawn. — BradV 03:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Arbetarbladet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable newspaper mini stub, no reliable sources, no in text sources, no secondary sources, likely a translation of a similarly non notable but slightly (slightly) longer stub in swedish. NewAtThis (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC) WITHDRAW NOMINATIONNewAtThis (talk) 03:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomNewAtThis (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as 1170+ Google News hits and over half a million Google hits lend credence to the notion of notability. My Swedish is a bit rusty so perhaps, as an expert on the Swedish media, you can outline why this apparently major Swedish newspaper which serves a large geographical area and is itself widely quoted is not-notable. - Dravecky (talk) 12:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep; although my understanding is that "Arbetarbladet" just means something like "Worker's Newspaper", raising the possibility that more than one paper bears this name. This would appear to be a daily newspaper in the major city of Gävle, which would seem to make a fairly strong case that this is a reasonable stub on a notable topic. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Without sources, it is OR, i hardly call 68K a major city.68.27.12.1 (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a misinterpretation of WP:NOR, which seeks to limit original conclusions. ("Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found.) It is not the same thing as lacking sources. We have unreferenced, suggesting that we have many articles waiting for someone with the access and inclination to add them. --Dhartung | Talk 01:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. This is a major daily newspaper in Sweden, and can easily be expanded and sourced. The anon comment above is gringocentrism at its worst. --Soman (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, there is also a Arbetarbladet in Finland, and 1869-1888 there was a Arbetarebladet published in Sweden (same name, just a more archaic spelling), see: . --Soman (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.