Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbjarb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 21:18Z 

Arbjarb

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a dictionary definition of an unsourced neologism. None of the few Google hits for this word appear to be using it in the sense described here. This was originally submitted to WP:PROD but the original author removed the prod tag; it may qualify for speedy deletion but I'm not sure under which criterion. At any rate, I recommend a delete. --Metropolitan90 22:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Hawaiian717 22:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Surely an obvious and spurious neologism. Wikipedia is not about something made up one day in school.--Anthony.bradbury 22:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Pavel Vozenilek 23:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced, and I can't find a single statement about it online, so extremely likely to be non-notable. ◄ Zahakiel ►  23:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Farewell, near anagram of my name!  (jarbarf) 18:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.