Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arboring


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to arborist. Anything useful can be merged at editorial option. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Arboring

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary and the information is already covered in a lot more detail in Arborist. JD554 (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * When you see duplicate articles that discuss the same thing under different titles, then Duplicate articles is where you should head. This is Articles for deletion.  No deletion is required here. Uncle G (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps if there was something worth merging I would have done. This article is merely a dictionary style definition.--JD554 (talk) 07:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How much content step #2 of the merger process involves does not stop that from being the process to use. This is Articles for deletion.  Article merger does not involve deletion in any way, or at any stage of the process.  Don't bring duplicate articles to AFD just because merging them would be easy.  &#9786;  Uncle G (talk) 13:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This really can't be merged into other pages, it's just someone's invented term that they're trying to promote on Wikipedia. Do a search, you'll find few references at all to it, and most of the hits are use of the word in a different context. I agree with deletion--Trees4est (talk) 23:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.