Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arborland Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Sourcing seems to have been addressed. W.marsh 03:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Arborland Center

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable mall in Ann Arbor. Only source is another wiki. A search for good sources found none. Makes a couple of unsourced claims and that's about it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * keep - I am impressed with the profit margin of 17 times the initial investment, although a Cite may be difficult stating the exact reason, I think that is notable that a property increases in value that much. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another in the long list of not notable US malls.  If return on initial investment makes something notable, then we have a lot of vacant land out here that qualify for articles.  The mall needs to be notable. If the owner is a good businessmen, then the owner might merit an article. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's kind of the point ... the owner tore down parts of the mall (making it more like your vacant land) and thus increased the value of the property by a factor of 17. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  09:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete After a ten page search for "Arborland Center" Google found nothing, so I'd say it isn't notable. Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  03:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you try "Arbourland Shopping Center" or "Arbourland Mall", plenty of GHits under thoes names. And as the Mall was "De-Malled" in 1994, all thoes names become viable search patterns for the following 13 years. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  09:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Comment I say keep now that sources have been added. The article still needs work, but it looks much better. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * keep Is sourced well enough to meet WP:N it appears. Hobit (talk) 02:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Also lots of stuff at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=ann+arbor+arborland+&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8&um=1


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.