Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbornet (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Arbornet
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet any of the three notability criteria set forth in WP:WEB. Tan  &#124;   39  05:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete It does exist, and has been around for quite a while, but I couldn't find reliable sources focusing on it in detail. It is an old ISP, so it gets listed a fair bit in older directories of ISPs, but that does not qualify as significant coverage in my mind. I am open to changing my mind should reliable sources appear, since so old an ISP could very well have been notable, if only somebody had written extensively about it. Ray  Talk 02:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.