Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arborophilia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no consensus for deletion JForget  02:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Arborophilia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable play with no WP:RS references to reviews, writer or production. Speedy delete was removed in May 2008. Flowanda | Talk 06:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm puzzled why the sources listed are not reliable. In any case, play was aparently reviewed in Detroit News and Detroit Free Press.  Check Lexis News/Academic TRATTOOO (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Play by notable playwright at large regional theater, reviewed by multiple WP:RS. Vartanza (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * KEEP -- I am (hopefully) writing my thesis on Professor Appel and his works are unquestionable notable. I have photopies of both reviews of this play and a feature, front page article by Barbara Hoover in the Detroit News about they play and Professor Appel's influences in creating it. A lot of people, especially conservatives, don't like Prof. Appel's ideas, but that does not mean that they are not important. I may be biased because I am studying his writings, but at the same time I believe I know much more about his writings than most people. I vote to keep this article as it is! JohnTalaver (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.