Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arborophilia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep for Arborophilia and no consensus for the rest as there was zero discussion about them. (they were never tagged anyway) Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Arborophilia
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previous AFD, Articles for deletion/Arborophilia, was dominated 100% by socks of User:TRATTOOO. Article was created as promo spam. Only mentions in local press, no significant secondary source commentary from any other sources. -- Cirt (talk) 20:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Also adding these other self promo spam pages edited primarily only by socks of User:TRATTOOO. -- Cirt (talk) 20:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete  per nominator. Kurdo777 (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 02:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - this play did receive some coverage from independent reliable sources: ,,. I'm not sure if that's enough for notability, but it's not completely unheard of. Robofish (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to list of philias, rather than delete, surely.— S Marshall T/C 02:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Not very important but still covered in reliable sources. Wolfview (talk) 11:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't have to be important, only covered in reliable sources. If it's notable in Ohio and Michigan, it's notable 74.50.113.31 (talk) 00:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.