Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbour group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete – article is clearly advertising for this company without any mention of notability. - Krakatoa  Katie  06:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Arbour group

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article generally comes across as advertising without much of notability assertion besides being one of a few in a niche market. I haven't found any sources to establish notability and the one source on the article seems pretty trivial (conducting business under an FDA regulation?). This was a disputed prod. Cquan (after the beep...) 06:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 08:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No case for notability of this business within WP:CORP is made in this article.  The only reference is to the Code of Federal Regulations, which does not mention this business specifically.  The article contains promotional language inappropriate for an encyclopedia article (e.g. services offer distinct benefits).  - Smerdis of Tlön 14:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.