Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arca Dynamics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Arca Dynamics

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't see a case for WP:NCORP. Much of the sourcing (here and what else I could find) is churnalism, mere mentions, and other ROUTINE coverage. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering,  and Italy.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, I couldn't find any good potential sources; notability is doubtful. — Danre98 ( talk ^ contribs ) 00:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The sources that have been added are unfortunately not sufficient. I have checked them and all are either non-independent or are only mentions of the company (not significant coverage). In my opinion the most promising source was the one from Fiera Roma, but that's not independent because it's a venue talking about a fair it will be hosting shortly. I also don't think it's possible to find good sources covering this company (at least, not now). — Danre98 ( talk ^ contribs ) 01:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Some additional references have been added to the article. Hms1103 (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If possible I would like to ask for further advice to raise the quality of the article. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * As indicated above, the issue is the poor quality of sources. The routine coverage the average corporation gets and the churnalism they buy doesn't cut it. If a corporation can accomplish something in the marketplace then you'll have legitimate news coverage upon which to base an article. Look at the sort of coverage the article about SpaceX cites. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and is not meant to catalog every company that exists just because we can prove it exists. Arca Dynamics isn't even ten years old, yet, so I think we can wait until they really garner attention. So long as you have no conflict of interest there's no rush to create this article, right? Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I am unable to locate any sources which meets NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 13:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.