Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcade City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  14:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Arcade City

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently an attempt to promote the company and their mobile application. No indicators of high usage/download rank or any popularity (<800 users daily activity). No distinction from hundreds of thousands of other similar applications shown either. Finally, no citations in any majorly circulated media. Free.enchant (talk) 00:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant advertisement. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Music1201  talk  04:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, this looks like a professional stub, but about a rather new company. Please consolidate the four cleanup templates into one "multiple issues" if possible. I'd do it, but all my experiments with "multiple issues" failed. COI info added. – Be..anyone (talk)  20:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious advertising, no notability whatsoever. Nearly all content is copied straight from their website. Free.enchant (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.