Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcane Legends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the article subject is notable. (non-admin closure) buidhe 01:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Arcane Legends

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly formatted, with description focused primarily on the game at the expense of the rest of the article. SuperUserCode (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SuperUserCode (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep though I think WP:TNT applied here and should have been WP:G11 deleted, as the article was completely promotional at that point . I found few sources where it was covered beyond trivial or routine mentions in WP:VG/RS and some sources with Wiki articles, like Pocket Gamer, Engadget , Slide to Play , Gamezebo , Forbes  (while written by a contributor, the reviewer is now an editor at Game Informer, which adds to reliability), a paragraph in Svet Kompjutera , Tech in Asia . There would need to be some discussion about Modojo, but since its owned by the same network as Shacknews that is deemed reliable at WP:VG/RS, I'd consider it reliable as well . It passes WP:GNG overall. I wouldn't oppose a WP:TNT deletion, since there is nothing here to salvage right now. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - A quick search led to four in-depth reviews from reliable sources (which I have added to the article). SIGCOV in RS'es is the GNG benchmark against which article subjects are assessed and this one passes English Wikipedia's threshold for inclusion. Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  12:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.