Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcangel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy redirect to Archangel per Grutness and CaveatLector. Band is non-notable but this is a common misspelling. Daniel Case 04:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Arcangel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable reggaeton artist. Only "reference" is their Myspace page, so it fails WP:V. Does not meet WP:MUSIC, as the article's label is not notable and he has no awards or known media coverage. Article is full of peacock terms with no references to back up the articles claims of fame. I say delete. --  Boricua  e  ddie  00:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7, non-notable band. No claims to fame, too many peacock terms (Peacock, incidentally, is my last name), fails WP:MUSIC. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and use as a redirect to Archangel (potential misspelling). Grutness...wha?  00:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, not notable band. Realkyhick 00:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Is it me, or do many of the unknown artists make sure to explain how they are "famous", followed by a "rise to fame" section? Pharmboy 00:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't forget to redirect to archangel, because I'm certain this is a common misspelling. CaveatLectorTalk 04:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing better than a plug for a band that is not even famous timhud 04:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.