Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arch-Con Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Arch-Con Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Construction company does not meet WP:NCORP- this is a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL company with references consisting of largely non-independent or WP:ROUTINE coverage. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  08:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, does not meet standards for inclusion. 5225C (talk &bull; contributions) 08:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The page easily meets WP:CORPDEPTH with the in-depth articles such as Houston Business Journal, BISNOW and CHRON. Also, the organization is operational across 7 major US states. Idunnox3 (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to get plenty of coverage in the construction and national press, which cover the construction industry of the Southwestern USA. The fact that these cover lots of other constructions facts too is not a reason to delete as that's the nature of industry journalists works.--Rupertdonovan (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is very well sourced indicating its notability on regional and national levels. It certainly meets WP:NCORP.--Chartwind (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.